Great Moments in the History of Solar Physics (3)


Earlier Great Moments in the history of solar physics


1859: First observation of a solar flare

On 1 September 1859, the amateur astronomer Richard C. Carrington (1826-1875) was engaged in his daily monitoring of sunspots, when he noticed two rapidly brightening patches of light near the middle of a sunspot group he was studying (indicated by A and B on the drawing below). In the following minutes the patches dimmed again while moving with respect to the active region, finally disappearing at positions C and D. This unusual event was also independently observed by R. Hodgson (1804-1872), another British astronomer.


Reproduction of a drawing by R.C. Carrington, showing the location of the flare he observed while making a drawing of an active region. Reproduced from his 1860 paper in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (vol. 20, p. 13).

This serendipitous observation represents the first clear description of a solar flare, corresponding to a sudden and intense heating of solar atmospheric plasma caused by reconnection of magnetic fields. What Carrington observed would today be called a two-ribbon flare. Only the largest flares are bright enough to be seen in visible light. They are readily seen in X-rays, however (see slide 15 of the HAO slide set). An earlier, plausible observational report of a white light flare has been found in the (unpublished) notebooks of the English scientist and amateur astronomer Stephen Gray (1666-1736), who on 27 December 1705 observed what he described as a ``flash of lightning'' near a sunspot.

Both Carrington and Hodgson noted that magnetic monitoring instruments registered strong disturbances at about the same time, but it is not possible to tell for sure whether these were due to the flare they actually saw. It is more likely that they were caused by other generalized solar disturbances of which the flare was but one manifestation.

References and further readings:

Carrington, R.C. 1860, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 20, p. 13. Lang, K.R. 2000, The Sun from Space, Springer, chap. 6


1859: The chemical composition of the Sun

In the late 1850s the chemist Robert Wilhelm Bunsen (1811-1899) and theoretical physicist Gustav Kirchhoff (1824-1887), both at Heidelberg, took on the issue of spectral line identification pretty much where Fraunhofer had left it some 40 years earlier. By simultaneous observations of the solar spectrum and laboratory flame spectra, they showed that (bright) emission lines in heated gases coincide with (dark) absorption lines seen when observing white light shining through the same cool gas. This established the empirical basis needed for the identification of the dark lines seen in the solar spectrum. By careful comparison with emission lines seen in the laboratory for various pure gases, Kirchhoff could demonstrate the existence in the Sun of a large number of chemical elements, mostly metals, also present on Earth. Hydrogen was identified spectroscopically in 1862 by A. Ångström (1814-1874), but it is only much later, in the 1920's, that Hydrogen was recognized as the most abundant solar constituent.


Reproduction of part of the map of the solar spectrum published in 1863 by Kirchhoff, showing the identification of a large number of spectral lines with various chemical elements. Note numerous clear matches for Iron (Fe).

Following this and other groundbreaking work by David Brewster (1781-1868) and Ångström, spectroscopy continued to progress throughout the second half of the eighteenth century. In the solar context, some of the most active and innovative observers were J. Norman Lockyer (1836-1920) Jules Janssen (1824-1907), Hermann Carl Vogel (1841-1907), William Huggins (1824-1910), Angelo Secchi (1818-1878), Charles Young (1834-1908), and Samuel Langley (1834-1906). Even at that time, spectroscopy was still an empirical science without a sound physical basis, as quantum mechanics lay half a century in the future.

References and further readings:

Meadows, A.J. 1984, The Origins of Astrophysics, in The General History of Astronomy, vol. 4A, ed. O. Gingerich, Cambridge University Press, pps. 3-15.


1860: First observations of a coronal mass ejection

The total solar eclipse of 18 July 1860 was probably the most thoroughly observed eclipse up to that time. The three drawings are a sample of drawings produced at that time which include depictions of a peculiar feature in the SW (lower right) portion of the corona. Based on comparison with modern coronal observations, it is quite likely that these represent the first record of a Coronal Mass Ejection in progress.



Click on the above to view full size diagrams
Drawings of the 1860 eclipse by G. Tempel (top left), von Feilitzsch (top center), F.A. Oom (top right), E.W. Murray (bottom right), F. Galton (bottom center), and C. von Wallenberg (bottom right). Reproduced from Ranyard, C.A 1879, Mem. Roy. Astron. Soc., 41, 520, chap. 44.

Today coronal mass ejections are known to represent one of the more energetic -and geoeffective- manifestation of solar activity, with up to 10 billion tons of material being ejected into interplanetary space at speeds reaching up to 1000 kilometer per second. For more detail on CMEs see slide 13 and slide 14 of the HAO slide set).

References and further readings:

Eddy, J.A. 1974, A Nineteenth-century Coronal Transient, in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 34, 235-240.


1865: The first solar cycle model

For nearly two decades the sunspot cycle uncovered by Schwabe begged for an explanation. In the quest for a physical explanation, its Its apparent cyclicity lead naturally to a well-known piece of celestial clockwork: planetary motions. Already in 1852, Rudolf Wolf took due note of the approximate numerical coincidence between the sunspot cycle period of 11.1 years with the orbital period of Jupiter (11.86 yr), and later proceeded to fit his time series of relative sunspot number to a quadruple-harmonic function based on the orbital periods of Jupiter, Saturn, Earth and Venus. However, Wolf himself was not overly impressed with his fits, and he wisely refrained from drawing strong conclusions from his results. However, others would soon discover what looked for a while like a very appealing variation on this theme, based on planetary tidal influences.

The method used by the Kew team to link the variations of sunspot areas with planetary positions. The diagram is drawn in the solar equatorial plane. The portion of the solar disk facing Earth (bottom) is divided into 10 contiguous longitudinal sectors each 14 deg wide. As solar rotation carries sunspots across the sectors, the total sunspot areas in each sector are computed and grouped according to this or that planet being in the quadrant centered on conjunction (A), opposition (C) and quadrature (B and D). [Reproduced from: P. Charbonneau, Journal for the history of astronomy, 33, Fig. 4]


The first detailed, quantitative physical model of the solar cycle was developped between 1865 and 1872 by an odd trio of solar observers working at Kew Observatory in England: the terrestrial magnetism expert and observatory's director Balfour Stewart (1828-1887); The head of the solar photographic program and oftentimes financial backer Warren De La Rue (1815-1889); and the human computer Benjamin Loewy, a young astronomer trained in Hamburg and hired specifically for data reduction work on the various solar projects ongoing at Kew. Following up on an earlier idea by Stewart, they looked for correlations between planetary ecliptical longitudes and the appearance, growth and decay of individual spots located at specific heliographic longitudes. While they originally found a number of promising correlations involving Venus, Jupiter and Mercury, these all fail to hold as more extended data became available. By 1874 they had largely abandoned the idea, although for half century theirs remained the only extant physical model of the solar cycle, and as such was often discussed in solar physics textbooks into the first decades of the twentieth century.

References and further readings:

Charbonneau, P., The rise and fall of the first solar cycle model, in Journal for the history of astronomy, 33, 351-372, 2002.

De La Rue, W., Stewart, B., and Loewy, B., Researches on solar physics. Second series. On the behavoir of the sun-spots with regard to increase and diminution, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 14, 59-63, 1865.


1869: The coronal green line

At the 7 August 1969 solar eclipse, visible in North America, the american astronomers Charles A. Young (1834-1908) and William Harkness (1837-1903) both independently noted the presence of a faint emission line in the green part of the otherwise featureless coronal spectrum.


Late nineteenth century Map of the coronal spectrum in the vicinity of the so-called "green line" ascribed to the mysterious chemical element "coronium". The numerical scale on top corresponds to the modern scale introduced by Angstrom, while the "1474" label refers to a scale introduced earlier by Kirchhoff. These are all emission lines superimposed on a fainter continuum. [Reproduced from: A.C. Young, The Sun, second edition 1896, Fig. 93 (p. 258)]


Young, one of the leading spectroscopists of his times, would have never imagined that this discovery would offer solar astronomers a puzzle that would survive him by over three decades. Young himself put a lot effort in identifying the mysterious "coronal green line", first tentastively identifying it with a laboratory iron line, then in 1876 resolving iit into a doublet of which one component did not coincide with anything known in the laboratory. Young and others thus suggested the possible existence of a new chemical element unknown on Earth, which they named coronium.

References and further readings:

Meadows, A.J. 1970, Early Solar Physics, Pergamon Press.

More on Coronium, from laserstars.org


1870: The internal structure of the sun

Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century, ideas regarding the internal constitution of the sun and stars ranged high and wide. By the 1860's, the spectroscopic work of Kirchoff and collaborators had offered strong evidence that at least the solar atmosphere was in gaseous form, and quite hot at that, but ideas regarding the solar interior remained in the realm of pure speculation. This first began to change with the groundbreaking work Jonathan H. Lane (1819-1880), who in 1870 published a paper in the American Journal of Science and Arts (vol. 50, p. 57) presenting a first mathematical model of the solar interior. Lane assumed that the sun's interior was gaseous and chemically homogeneous throughout, and in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium, whereby the inward gravitational pull of the sun's mass is everywhere balanced by an outward gradient in gas pressure. Further assuming that thermal equilibrium enforced by convective motions would lead to an adiabatic stratification, Lane obtained mathematical relationships describing the rise of density and temperature as one moves from the surface towards the sun's center.


Diagrams illustrating the internal structure of Lane's polytropic spheres. The two sets of concentrics spherical shells drawn here correspond to ten equally spaced isolevels of temperature (left) and fractional mass (right), and illustrate graphically the internal stratification of stars in simultaneous hydrostatic and convective equilibrium. [Reproduced from A.S. Eddington, The internal constitution of the stars, 1926 (1959 Dover reprint), Fig. 1]

Knowing the Sun's mass and radius, Lane could integrate the density profile to set the density scale, leading to a surface density of 0.000363 gram per cubic centimeters. Then, using then the perfect gas law, he could estimate the sun's atmospheric temperature, arriving at at 30,000K. Though some five times too high by modern standards, this confirmed the high temperatures inferred by spectroscopic means.

References and further readings:

Tassoul, J.-L., and Tassoul, M., A concise history of solar and stellar physics, Princeton University Press reprint, 2004.


1881: The solar constant, again

By the second half of the nineteenth century, after various solar observing expedition to mountaintops, it was becoming increasingly clear that the Earth's atmosphere absorbs a significant portion of the sun's luminosity. Consequently, attempts at determining the solar constant were moved to the highest practical altitudes.
Langley's base camp on California's Mt Whitney, July 1881. Some of Langley's instruments failed to arrive or arrived damaged, with the crucial spectral bolometer back in working order only by the end of August. The expedition was cut short on 8 September due to worsening observing conditions caused by the breakout of a series of wildfires elsewhere in California a few days earlier. Nonetheless, valuable data were collected. Reproduced from: Eddy, J.A. 1990, J. Hist. Astron., 21, p. 115.

The American scientist Samuel Langley (1834-1906) carried out the most elaborate attempt at determining the solar constant at the time, during an expedition to Mt Whitney, California, in July 1881. Using his recently invented bolometer (an instrument based on the varying electrical resistivity of metals with temperature), as well as other instruments, Langley carried out measurements at different wavelengths and at different altitudes, demonstrating the strong variation with wavelength of the absorption by Earth's atmosphere. However, the solar constant value he calculated at the time, 2903 Watt per square meters, is nearly a factor of two larger than the modern value (1367 W/m2), something apparently due to errors in the data reduction procedure, since Langley's later assistant Charles Abbot (1872-1973) obtained 1465 W/m2 with the original Mt Whitney data.

References and further readings:

Hufbauer, K. 1991, Exploring the Sun, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Eddy, J.A. 1990, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 21, p. 115.

Foukal, P.V. 1990, Solar Astrophysics, John Wiley and Sons.


1899: The Sun and the Aurora Borealis

The idea of solar-terrestrial interactions, going back to William Herschel's suggestion of a correlation between sunspots and climate, was buttressed somewhat by the 1852 discovery of the link between geomagnetic activity and the sunspot cycle, but throughout the nineteenth the overall idea was considered suspicious by the scientific establishment. The modern era of solar-terrestrial interaction studies was launched by the pioneer norwegian scientist Kristian Birkeland (1867-1917) who, in the course of the 1899-1900 Norwegian Polar Expedition, set out to study in detail the Aurorae Borealis. Birkeland concluded from his various observations that aurorae are caused by the episodic arrival of beams of charged particles from the Sun, deflected and guided to high geographic latitudes by the Earth's magnetic field.


The photograph on the left shows Birkeland's so-called terella experiment (with Birkeland himself operating the apparatus). Beams of electrons are shot at a spherical magnet to produce light emission concentrated in auroral-like arcs (photograph on right). [Images downloaded from Birkeland current document on www.answers.com]


In the first decade of the twentieth century Birkeland went on to produce artificial aurorae in his laboratory, by sending cathode rays (beams of electrons) on a spherical magnet, as depicted on the above photographs. By modern standards, Birkeland explanation of the origin of aurora borealis is correct in the main although not in all details. Unfortunately, Birkeland's groundbreaking contribution to auroral physics were dismissed by most other researchers at the time as overly speculative or even irrelevant, and only gained proper appreciation in the second half of the twentieth century.

References and further reading:

Project NORDLYS - Northern Lights - Birkeland

Jago, L., The Northern Lights, Penguin Press, 2002


1904: The butterfly diagram




Photograph of the first sunspot butterfly diagram, drawn in 1904 by Walter and Annie Maunder. Over each successive solar rotation, a vertical line segment spanning the range of latitudes where sunspots are obse rved is drawn on a time-latitude diagram. This results in a striking visual depiction of the wave-like spatiotemporal progression of magnetic activity in the course of the solar cycle. [Source: T.J. Bogdan/High Altitude Observatory]


While the equatorward drift of sunspot emergences as the cycle proceeds had been noted already in the mid-nineteenth century by
Spörer and Carrington, it was put on his most graphicaly striking form by the husband-and-wife team of E. Walter Maunder (1851-1928) and Annie Maunder (1868-1947). It occurred to them to plot, on a time-latitude diagram, the latitude at which sunspots are observed, independently of their heliographic longitude, over a time span covering a complete solar cycle. This graphical depiction remains in use today, although what is commonly plotted is the fractional area coverage of sunspots as a function of latitude (see for example this butterfly diagram, produced by D. Hathaway at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center). The sequential "butterflies" defined by successive cycles are tracking the equatorward progression of a cyclic "magnetic wave" produced deep within the solar interior by a hydromagnetic dynamo mechanism.

References and further reading:

Century-old sunspot chart is restored, UCAR Quarterly Communication, summer 2000.


1906: The structure of the solar atmosphere

Since Kirchhoff, it was generally believed that the solar atmosphere was made of a layer of cool gas, illuminated from below by the hotter, luminous solar interior. Such an inert atmosphere would appear darker near the solar limbs than at disk center, since in the former situation a greater thickness of atmosphere is traversed along the line-of-sight. This limb darkening had indeed been observed since Galileo's time, but the accurate quantitative measurements made in the second half of the nineteenth century, in particular by Langley, yielded results incompatible with a simple inert, absorbing atmosphere.

Modern plot of the numerical results tabulated in the landmark 1906 paper by Schwarzschild cited below. The plots shows the expected center-to-limb darkening, the green line corresponding to an atmosphere in radiative equalibrium, and the red line to the adiabatic stratification expected from convective equilibrium. The solid dots are the measured values. Disk center is at r/R=0 and the limb at r/R=1.

Progress first took place at the hand of the german-born british physicist Arthur Schuster (1851-1934), who in a series of papers written between 1903 and 1905 investigated the passage of radiation through an atmosphere that can not only absorp, but also emit and scatter and re-emit the light traversing it. A full model of the solar atmosphere based on radiative equilibrium was soon put calculated by the german astrophysicist Karl Schwarzschild (1873-1916), who could also show that the observed limb solar darkening profile pointed to a state of radiative equilibrium, rather than the adiabatic stratification expected to result from convective equilibrium. Schwarzschild's remarkable 1906 paper opened the door to the physical interpretation of stellar spectra, and more generally to the construction of realistic structural and evolutionary models of the sun and stars.

References and further reading:

Meadows, A.J. 1970, Early Solar Physics, Pergamon Press.

Tassoul, J.-L., and Tassoul, M., A concise history of solar and stellar physics, Princeton University Press, 2004.


1908: The magnetic nature of sunspots

The magnetically-induced Zeeman splitting in the spectrum of a sunspot. Reproduced from the 1919 paper by G.E. Hale, F. Ellerman, S.B. Nicholson, and A.H. Joy (in The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 49, pps. 153-178).

The study of sunspots and their 11-year cycle was finally put on a firm physical footing by the epoch-making work of George Ellery Hale (1868-1938) and collaborators, in the opening decades of the twentieth century. In 1907-1908, by measuring the Zeeman splitting in magnetically sensitive lines in the spectra of sunspots and detecting the polarization of the split spectral components, Hale provided the first unambiguous and quantitative demonstration that sunspots are the seats of strong magnetic fields (see also slide 4 and slide 5 of the HAO slide set The Sun: a Pictorial Introduction). Not only was this the first detection of a magnetic field outside the Earth, but the inferred magnetic field strength, 3000 Gauss, turned out over a thousand times greater than the Earth's own magnetic field. It was subsequently realized that the pressure provided by such strong magnetic field would also lead naturally to the lower temperatures observed within the sunspots, as compared to the photosphere.

References and further readings:

Hale, G.E. 1908, On the probable existence of a magnetic field in sunspots, The Astrophysical Journal, 28, pps. 315-343,

Stix, M. 1989, The Sun, Springer.


1919: The Sun's magnetic cycle

A diagram taken from the 1919 paper by G.E. Hale, F. Ellerman, S.B. Nicholson, and A.H. Joy (in The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 49, pps. 153-178), illustrating what is now known as Hale's polarity laws.. This presented solid evidence for the existence of a well-organized large-scale magnetic field in the solar interior, which cyclically changes polarity approximately every 11 years.

In the decade following his groundbreaking discovery of sunspot magnetic fields, George Ellery Hale (1868-1938) and his collaborators went on to show that large sunspots pairs almost always (1) show the same magnetic polarity pattern in each solar hemisphere, (2) show opposite polarity patterns between the North and South solar hemispheres, and (3) these polarity patterns are reversed from one sunspot cycle to the next, indicating that the physical magnetic cycle has a period of twice the sunspot cycle period. These empirical observations have stood the test of time and are since known as Hale's polarity Laws. Their physical origin is now now known to originate with the operation of a large scale hydromagnetic dynamo within the solar interior, although the details of the process are far from adequately understood. Because the sun's dynamo generated magnetic field is ultimately responsible for all manifestations of solar activity (flares, coronal mass ejections, etc.), to this day solar dynamo modeling remains a very active area of research in solar physics.

References and further readings:

Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., and Joy, A.H. 1919, The Astrophysical Journal, 49, pps. 153-178,

Stix, M. 1989, The Sun, Springer.


1926: The internal structure of the sun, again

The theory of solar internal structure originally developped by Lane in 1870, and later elaborated upon by many researchers including most notably August Ritter (1826-1908) and Robert Emden (1862-1940), reached its mature form in the all-encompassing theory of stellar structure developped by Arthur Stantley Eddington (1882-1944) over a ten year period starting in 1916, and culminating with the publication in 1926 of his book The Internal Constitution of the Stars.


The mass-luminosity relation predicted by Eddington's stellar structure theory, compared to then-available data for various types of stars. The good agreement provided strong empirical evidence in support of Eddington's theory. [Reproduced from A.S. Eddington, The internal constitution of the stars, 1926 (1959 Dover reprint), Fig. 2]


In the late ninetenth century, it had been realized that for the kinds of internal temperature suggested by the early structural models of Lane and others, outward energy transport within the solar interior most likely took place via radiation, rather than convective currents. Capitalized on recent advances in the theory of radiative transfer, notably by Arthur Schuster (1851-1934) in England and Karl Schwarzschild (1873-1916) in Germany, Eddington set forth what remain to this days the basic theory of stellar structure. Because he focused on radiative equilibrium, Eddington's models gave their best results when compared to stars more massive than the sun, convection being indeed needed to properly described the solar outer layers. One vital missing piece still remained, namely the internal source of the Sun's energy...

References and further readings:

Tassoul, J.-L., and Tassoul, M., A concise history of solar and stellar physics, Princeton University Press, 2004.


1931: The Coronagraph

Much of the remarkable progress made in understanding the Sun's outer atmosphere had been made through the use of observations carried out at times of total solar eclipses. The relative rarity of such eclipses, the cost and logistical difficulties of travelling to often remote location to observe then, the short duration of totality, as well as the frustrating vaguaries of weather, motivated the search for a way to observe the corona at will and in full daylight. This was finally achieved in 1931 by the French solar physicist Bernard Lyot (1897-1952), who first designed an instrument now known as the coronagraph.


Lyot's first coronagraph design. The occulting disk is at B, and the diaphragm and screen at D, E are needed to block stray light arising from diffraction at the primary lens and diaphragm A. Reproduced from L'Astronomie, 66 (1952) (Fig. 113, p. 269).

A coronagraph is nothing more than a telescope equipped with an occulting disk sized in such a way as to block out the solar disk. Although this may sound trivial, it turns out to be extremely difficult to achieve the needed accurate optical alignment and mechanical stability, without which stray light makes the viewing of the faint corona all but impossible. Lyot also managed to secure the first full daylight photographs of the corona. His success motivated other to replicate and modify his design, the most succesful of these followers being Max Waldmeier at the ETH/Zürich, and Donald H. Menzel (1901-1976) at Harvard College Observatory.

References and further readings:

D'Azambuja, L. 1952, L'oeuvre de Bernard Lyot, L'Astronomie, 66, 265-277.

Hufbauer, K. 1991, Exploring the Sun, The Johns Hopkins University Press.


1941: The million-degree solar corona

In the mid-1930's, coronagraphic observations of the solar corona by Lyot had revealed that the faint coronal emission lines were much broader in wavelength than expected. Under the assumption that this broadening was of a thermal nature, Lyot boldly inferred a coronal temperature of around 600,000 K. However, since alternate broadening mechanisms existed, his estimate of the high coronal temperature was met with due caution at the time.
Schematic representations of the atomic energy levels and transitions responsible for the coronal emission lines. Young's 1869 green line is the 2P transition of FeXIV on the lower right. [Reproduced from: B. Edlen, Monthly Not. Roy. Astr. Soc., 105, 1945; Fig 4, p. 328 (George Darwin Lecture)]

Acceptance of the very high coronal temperature ended up coming through the spectroscopic work of atomic physicists Walter Grotrian (1890-1954) and Bengt Edlén (1906-1993). The breakthrough came when it was realized that a large number of unidentified coronal emission lines, attributed starting in 1869 by Young and others to a hitherto unknown chemical element tentatively named "coronium", were in fact associated with high ionization stages of Iron (Fe) and Nickel (Ni). In fact, Edlén could show that 90% of all coronal emission lines could be attributable to FeX, FeXI, FeXIII and FeXIV. The required coronal temperatures, initially estimated greater than 250,000K, rapidly rose to the modern value of 1-2 million K.

References and further readings:

Shapley, H. (ed.), Source book in Astronomy, 1900-1950, Harvard University Press, 1960: paper 8.


1942: Solar radio emission

The possibility of radio emission (or "Hertzian waves" as it was known at the times) by the Sun was contemplated as early as 1890 by the American scientist Thomas A. Edison (1847-1931), but the first actual attempts were carried out in England by Sir Oliver Lodge (1851-1940). As with subsequents attempts by others in the opening decades of 20th century, no detection were made. The difficulty was not just one of sensitivity, but also of plain luck with timing of observations, since the strongest radio emission occurs in very intermittent bursts associated with large solar flares.


Lodge's experimental setup for detecting solar radio waves. The cylinder "A" is filled with metal filings, making a relatively poor conductor. The large drop in resistance caused by the absorption of a radio wave is readily detectable via the enhanced electrical current flowing through the circuit. The piece of wire "B" acts as an antenna to increase absorption. [reproduced from the collection of paper edited by W.T. Sullivan cited below, Fig. 4 (p. 142)]

The conjunction of required conditions materialized serendipitously during World War II, as a side effect of military radar development and research. WWII radars were sensitive, operated nearly continuously, and did so at a time spanning cycle's 17 maximum phase, during which solar radio bursts are more frequent. By the early 1940, numerous episodes of enhanced backg round noise and interference picked up by radar equipment had been noted. Fearing that Germans were developing and testing radar jamming systems, the British High Command instructed their radar experts to look into the matter. In February 1942 James Hey detected a burst of radio emission from the Sun, and a second one was detected by George C. Southworth (1890-1972) the following June. In America an independent detection was carried out in November 1943 by the pioneer radioastronomer Grote Reber (1911-2002). Radar research being then a militarily sensitive and highly classified subject, Hey and Southworth could only publish their findings after the end of WWII, and even then only in censored form.

Later solar radio observations were to confirm the million-degree temperature of the solar corona, inferred earlier by Grotrian and Edlén by spectroscopic means. Regular radio monitoring continued after World War II, with the so-called 10.7cm flux monitoring program at Canada's Herzberg Institute for Astrophysics, started in 1946, now providing the longest time series of a quantitative solar activity measurement other than counts of sunspots or faculae.

References and further readings:

Sullivan, W.T. III (ed.), Classics in Radio Astronomy, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1982: part III-G through III-J.

The Solar Radio Monitoring Programme at the Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics.


Did you find factual errors in any of the above documents? If so, we really want to know! please e-mail paulchar@astro.umontreal.ca.



Further General Readings

Historical:

Boas, M. 1962, The Scientific Renaissance 1450-1630, Harper & Row [Dover reprint available].

Crowe, M.J. 1990, Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution, Dover.

Hall, A.R. 1963, From Galileo to Newton 1630-1720, Harper & Row [1981 Dover reprint].

Hoskin, M. 1997 (ed.), The Cambridge illustrated History of Astronomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hufbauer, K. 1991, Exploring the Sun, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Meadows, A.J. 1970, Early Solar Physics, Pergamon Press.

Moore, P. 1974, Watchers of the Stars, Putnam.

Pannekoek, A. 1961, A History of Astronomy, New York: John Wiley Interscience.

Solar Physics, Non-Technical:

Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Sun

Solar Physics, Textbooks and Technical:

Foukal, P.V. 1990, Solar Astrophysics, John Wiley and Sons.

Lang, K.R. 2000, The Sun from Space, Springer.

Stix, M. 1989, The Sun, Springer.


Other web sites:

The Galileo Project

Institute and Museum of History of Science, Florence


Return to Earlier Great Moments in the history of solar physics.

      -Written by paulchar@astro.umontreal.ca.

-Last revised 8 January 2008 by paulchar@astro.umontreal.ca